One is a first - class politician on agricultural matters; the other is a first - class jurist.

You are a first class European.

Both of them have done a first - class job.

It attracts a new class of students to higher education.

It is first - class teamwork, which deserves to be emulated.

The drugs issue is a security issue.

The second issue is the really huge and complex issue of migration.

The report, however, omits to bring up one fundamental issue: the issue of traffic rights.

Otherwise, we restrict the issue and make it just an environmental issue, which it is not.

Doctors are a sensitive issue, human health is a very sensitive issue.

Tasks of that kind do exist.

We repudiate that kind of intolerance.

Nothing of the kind has happened, however.

We will commission a study of this kind.

This kind of thing is always happening.

Often, couples go their separate ways in a civilised manner.

We must deal with it in an exceptional manner.

And it does so in a manner which can work.

Parliament employed its powers in a sound manner under special circumstances.

It was offered on a voluntary basis in an exemplary manner.

These texts mark a step forward.

8518 People have overstepped the mark.

I just leave that as a question mark.

I believe we must mark out territories.

These results alone mark a historical turning point.

You can move a sack of potatoes around Europe more easily than a citizen can move.

Every time you try to move a country or move a continent, history grabs you by the ankles.

We must move in this direction.

I think that would be a good move.

We can only welcome such a move.

The real difficulty is to reconcile the three objectives and rank them in order of importance.

If we can remove it from the developing nations, we can also remove it from the world permanently.

Let us remove the obstacles.

Would you please sit down and remove that sign.

So it is important to remove the older animals.

I welcome the amendments brought forward to remove many of them.

That will send out a clear signal.

I believe it could send out the wrong signals.

The signal we send out must be clear.

We must send out a positive political message by giving our assent.

3729 This, it seems to me, would send out an extremely important signal.

And indeed there is a twofold shift.

That shift in position did not spread.

Firstly, the danger of a shift towards an intergovernmental approach.

The desired modal shift will come under review again then.

Above all, we must persuade governments not to shift the blame onto each other.

We must sort this sort of thing out much more quickly in future.

I cannot support this sort of trend.

I really expected nothing of the sort.

It makes no sort of sense whatsoever.

This sort of news is commonplace now.

We had a large team of officials there.

The other is to prepare the way for those who are provisionally outside the system to join the first team.

Road transport always seemed to cause far more pollution than rail transport.

Some people made the point that carcass transport should replace live animal transport.

This makes international transport both more expensive and more complicated than domestic transport.

That takes the burden off overland transport by adding another link to the chain of intermodal transport.

The same conditions must apply to passenger transport as apply to freight transport.

In our opinion the right way forward is another way.

19397 I believe we can find a way through and a positive way forward, but only if everyone cooperates.

It is evolving not only in a positive way, but also in a negative way.

Exchanging lists in this way is not an ideal way to engage in dialogue.

In this way, the limited available resources could be used sensibly and in a targeted way.