These incidents are no accident.
One such accident is enough.
I was the victim of a road accident.
17805 This was an accident waiting to happen.
The accident statistics for these areas speak plainly.
It is a pity it was not far more explicit and it is a pity it could not give us a lot more explanation.
I think that is a great pity.
45 This is a pity, in a sense.
It is a pity the report took so long.
I think it is a pity that this cannot be achieved.
But that is not a defect for us; on the contrary, it is a good idea.
I consider that this is a serious defect and that, in principle, it does not befit our legal system.
Consider educational disadvantage, for example.
46659 This puts more environmentally - friendly products at a disadvantage.
This amounts to a distortion of competition which puts public risk capital at a disadvantage.
Only at a local level can the negative cycle of disadvantage and discrimination be broken.
13754 This puts short sea shipping at a disadvantage compared to other modes of transport.
It is causing serious harm.
Drugs cause harm when they are abused.
23477 Instead, there is harm to the consumer.
This limitation may do smaller undertakings a lot of harm.
None of them come to any harm in the process.
It helps to spread the risks of injury widely and ensure compensation.
This is an irreparable loss.
We are witnessing a substantial loss of confidence everywhere.
It is therefore not entitled to loss of income grants.
It would entail huge costs and potential loss of trade.
I am thinking of aspects such as delays, loss, damage, etc.
2529 Quite the contrary, it would be a solution leading to calamity.
The damage is considerable this time as well, people have died and the material damage has been enormous.
Irreparable damage is being done.
This principle is called damage limitation.
Commissioner, the damage has been done.
They also seriously damage the indigenous populations.
We cannot accept this excessive striving for profits to the detriment of human development.
We hope this will not prove to be to the detriment of competition policy.
The people feel that any actual changes will be to the detriment of industry and consumers.
Companies cannot be free to wreak such havoc on people 's lives and communities.
This is not proposed out of mischief.