We have to examine situations case by case.

The documents must be examined on a case - by - case basis.

So from case to case it looks somewhat better today.

The principle of case - by - case assessment must apply for agriculture.

It has to be looked at on a case - by - case basis.

I think that one very important basic fact has been undervalued: the cultural fact.

The fact that there is such a " huge " turnout here tonight is a recognition of that fact by others.

The fact that snuff is less dangerous to people who use it is, in actual fact, less important.

Quite the reverse, in fact.

In fact, quite the contrary.

We have experience of the cheapest thing not being the best thing.

To call it so is one thing, to make it so is, of course, another, more difficult thing.

Such a thing is unthinkable.

That is the crucial thing.

One thing is abundantly plain.

This is the umpteenth affair involving new buildings.

Promoting employment, however, is a long - winded affair and comes under structural policy.

A few things are already clear, however, irrespective of the fraud affair itself.

It is in every sense a virtual affair, with no form of inspection.

But specialists point out to us that this is a particularly questionable affair.

That article is becoming meaningless.

Almost every article contains one of the words optional and non - compulsory.

We have in this directive an article which allows us to do that.

According to this article, state aid is irreconcilable with the common market, in principle.

Neither an article nor a protocol could, in themselves, resolve all the problems of sport.

I shall be mercifully brief.

I would ask him to be brief.

3521 I shall, of course, be brief.

I wish to make four brief points.

A brief word on the proposed amendments.

Forgeries are big business.

Naturally, it is a complex business.

This is an inhumane business.

This is a very tricky business.

That is quite a burden for business.

It is therefore a good cause.

This is a cause for concern.

7783 This will cause some irritation.

This should be a cause for panic.

This was a cause for great concern.

We can therefore table only one additional item.

Let us move on to the next item.

So that is the end of this item.

We have an important item on our agenda today.

We should now bring this item to an end.

So this is not a matter of principle but a matter of the formal place for this specific proposal.

Everybody supports this matter.

Borders are a sensitive matter.

This is an important matter.

Road safety is a serious matter.

They object to family unity.

I object to this line of reasoning.

No one can possibly object to that.

I object to this practice and will vote against it.

And we do not object to the setting of specific priorities for development.

Insanity prevailed over reason.

A second reason is security.

I also abstained for another reason.

Secondly, there is a political reason.

The reason is quite obvious.

It is something we have a great responsibility to do something about.

  'Pharmacon'   means both medicine and poison, something healing and something deadly.

It is beyond politics or law, it is something deeper, something spiritual.

What matters is that something is put on the agenda and that something is done.

971 Something has happened.

It is the very stuff of life.

Public access to documents is, of course, the very stuff of democracy.

There is no point in lifting a ban if no one is going to buy the stuff anyway.

Parliament is a separate subject.

It is a sensitive subject.

This is a complicated subject.

This subject is incredibly involved.

This is a most important subject.

We are not managing a bank or a shop.

This is where the one - stop shop can play a part.

We might just as well shut up shop and go home.

The agriculture budget is neither a self - service shop nor a high - yielding dairy cow.

We can shop in a larger market and often buy goods up to a third cheaper.

Such a concern is misplaced.

I can understand your concern.

It does concern pensioners.

This is a general political concern.

This has been a constant concern.

The drugs issue is a security issue.

The second issue is the really huge and complex issue of migration.

The report, however, omits to bring up one fundamental issue: the issue of traffic rights.

Otherwise, we restrict the issue and make it just an environmental issue, which it is not.

Doctors are a sensitive issue, human health is a very sensitive issue.

Your question is the fundamental question of how we can combine economic and social policies.

I want to know why this question, this very plain and simple question, is not being answered.

The third question concerns the question of harmonised pensions.

The question of a committee of inquiry is also a question of how rigorous future measures will be.

It is now, therefore, a question not of again bringing the directive into question but of enforcing it.