We have seen vote after vote lost.
Our final vote will of course depend on the direction this vote takes.
I would therefore have wished to vote against this provision in a recorded vote as well.
So our vote in favour of this supplementary budget is a vote coupled with a clear statement.
That quite clearly means that the vote has taken place, and it would be mistaken to call another vote.
The message that sound money has a huge impact on creating a sound economy is accepted.
Those proposals are sound.
I believe it is a sound agreement.
16489 The outcome was sound.
There are a number of sound amendments.
The problem of noise is therefore escalating, especially road and aircraft noise.
Setting ever stricter noise standards must reduce noise levels of aircraft around airports.
Of all noise sources, the noise generated by cars and lorries is the most crucial one.
We will be returning to the problems of noise when we deal with the directive on noise.
Noise - reducing tyres are already available.
I want to see civil society given a louder voice.
Once again, we add our voice to this positive request.
It is extremely important in our own interests that we speak with one voice.
At times, perhaps, their voice drowns out some of the other groups, in my judgment.
It is up to that country to voice its concerns.
I am surprised at the tone of this debate.
Doping in sport is like a priest who sins or a tone - deaf musician.
I do not agree with the tone of his criticism in relation to agricultural spending.
Of course, the tone is not one of party politics.
I am grateful but not surprised by the tone of the report.
We should not forget the radio sector in audio - visual.
The menu on television or mobile phones should have an audio alternative.
It is time to change the tune.
We will be voting against this new liberal theme tune.
As with all music it needs to be a fine tune and properly orchestrated.
29545 The parliamentary groups are whistling the same tune.
I am not prepared to pay the piper before he plays the tune.