hat does not alter the outcome.

Entire families are being sacrificed on the asphalt alter.

That might alter the whole attitude and the possibilities.

It does not alter the general structures of the proposal.

We should alter the staff regulations and disciplinary procedures and, especially, change our practice.

This change will not require a change in the proposal.

We must bear in mind that times change and the standards change with them.

This change is a complicated change.

Not for change piled upon change, but for stability.

This situation must change.

5403 , this simple operation can substantially modify the final result.

The reasons for the need to modify the regulation are twofold.

In such a case, the safety provisions of the directive will be used to modify or revoke the consent.

I would ask you to amend the attendance register accordingly.

Our second option is to amend the common position.

We are therefore proposing to amend the regulations as follows.

I would like to amend what is in the verbatim report.

Greece reports that it needs to amend its penal law.

And indeed there is a twofold shift.

That shift in position did not spread.

Firstly, the danger of a shift towards an intergovernmental approach.

The desired modal shift will come under review again then.

Above all, we must persuade governments not to shift the blame onto each other.

I now turn to the content.

I turn now to the amendments.

I now turn to another subject.

I turn to the question at hand.

We should not turn things round.